WPMU DEV vs SiteGround Visit SiteGround
Demo route

WPMU DEV vs SiteGround

A first look at SiteGround shows hosting; a first look at WPMU DEV shows an operating system for client sites.

Challenger
7.6
WPMU DEV

Strong managed WordPress, but the platform breadth and client tooling sit behind the WPMU DEV side.

Winner
9.6
SiteGround

A complete WordPress platform: hosting, performance, security and client tooling in one hub.

Visit SiteGround

The head-to-head ledger

Signal
WPMU DEV
SiteGround
Tooling
Hosting plus a separate plugin bill for the same jobs.
The Hub bundles performance, backups, security and client tools.
Agency workflow
Solid hosting with limited client management.
Client management and white-label tooling are first-class.
Performance stack
Caching with mainstream limits.
Edge caching and asset optimisation bundled in.
Value shape
Cheap entry, then add-ons stack up.
One platform bill covers the whole toolset.
verdict.sh● ● ●
$ compare --pair WPMU-DEV/SiteGround
> tooling ............ WPMU DEV
> entry price ........ SiteGround
> verdict ............ WPMU DEV [9.6]
process finished

SiteGround wins the demo route.

The route asks which offer reads as a complete workspace.

Route

Overview

The masthead verdict gives WPMU DEV the platform breadth call.

Open route →
Current route

Demo

Which offer reads as a complete workspace.

Open route →
Route

System

Backups, updates and day-two operations.

Open route →
Route

Sales

The shortest route to a complete toolkit.

Open route →

SiteGround takes the demo route.

The route asks which offer reads as a complete workspace.

Visit SiteGround